KofSports

Established 2015

NFL Research Tools

NFL Snap Counts 2026: Weekly Snap Counts & Snap % by Team

Track weekly NFL snap counts, snap percentages, and player usage for every team. Compare offensive snap share by player and position to identify changing roles, playing-time trends, and usage for fantasy football and NFL player prop research.

Updated through NFL Week 5

Latest Snap %•Last 3 Games•Last 5 Games•Season Usage•Week-over-Week Change
PlayerPosTeamWeekSnapsSnap %L3L5SeasonChange
vs LAC
QBDEN562100.0%99.3%99.6%99.6%+2.0
vs SEA
QBSF560100.0%100.0%97.0%97.0%0.0
vs DET
QBCAR475100.0%98.0%96.0%96.0%0.0
vs TEN
QBHOU566100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%0.0
vs HOU
QBTEN563100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%0.0
vs CHI
QBMIN252100.0%91.5%91.5%91.5%+17.0
vs TB
QBDAL560100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%0.0
vs PIT
QBIND571100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%0.0
vs NYJ
QBCLE568100.0%99.7%99.8%99.8%0.0
vs CHI
WRPHI350100.0%94.3%94.3%94.3%+12.0
vs LV
QBNE575100.0%93.7%96.2%96.2%0.0
vs ARI
QBSEA270100.0%95.0%95.0%95.0%+10.0
vs CLE
QBNYJ570100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%0.0
vs DET
QBARI573100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%0.0
vs JAX
QBPHI562100.0%97.3%98.4%98.4%0.0
vs DAL
QBTB572100.0%68.7%68.7%68.7%0.0
vs NYG
QBWAS562100.0%85.0%85.0%85.0%+45.0
vs MIA
QBCIN565100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%0.0
vs LA
QBBUF564100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%0.0
vs DEN
QBLAC567100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%0.0
vs NO
QBMIN571100.0%100.0%79.3%79.3%0.0
vs CIN
QBMIA566100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%0.0
vs BUF
QBLA582100.0%100.0%96.8%96.8%0.0
vs LV
QBKC460100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%0.0
vs SF
QBSEA563100.0%100.0%77.5%77.5%0.0
vs PHI
QBJAX572100.0%98.3%96.6%96.6%0.0
vs ATL
QBBAL576100.0%74.0%74.0%74.0%+52.0
vs MIN
QBNO545100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%0.0
vs GB
WRCHI56899.0%91.0%81.0%81.0%+10.0
vs BAL
WRATL56398.0%93.3%88.0%88.0%+9.0
vs IND
QBPIT55897.0%99.0%98.6%98.6%-3.0
vs CHI
QBGB55997.0%99.0%99.4%99.4%-3.0
vs MIN
WRNO54396.0%91.0%92.0%92.0%+7.0
vs MIA
WRMIN47596.0%94.0%91.3%91.3%-2.0
vs SF
TESEA56095.0%92.0%88.8%88.8%+5.0
vs ARI
QBDET56395.0%98.3%99.0%99.0%-5.0
vs BAL
QBATL56195.0%98.3%98.3%98.3%-5.0
vs MIN
QBTB36594.0%98.0%98.0%98.0%-6.0
vs WAS
QBNYG58494.0%98.0%95.5%95.5%-6.0
vs PIT
TEIND56794.0%91.0%91.0%91.0%+9.0
vs CLE
WRNYJ56593.0%95.7%90.0%90.0%-7.0
vs NYJ
TECLE56393.0%89.3%87.2%87.2%+4.0
vs CLE
WRNYJ56593.0%93.0%93.0%93.0%—
vs DET
WRCAR46992.0%63.3%52.0%52.0%+11.0
vs DAL
TETB56692.0%93.7%93.6%93.6%-3.0
vs IND
WRPIT55592.0%94.7%95.4%95.4%-5.0
vs SEA
TESF55592.0%89.3%72.4%72.4%+1.0
vs IND
WRPIT55592.0%53.0%48.4%48.4%+52.0
vs MIN
WRNO54191.0%87.0%86.2%86.2%+5.0
vs NYJ
WRCLE56291.0%91.7%92.0%92.0%-4.0
vs WAS
WRNYG58090.0%81.3%74.0%74.0%+14.0
vs DET
TEARI56690.0%92.7%89.2%89.2%-7.0
vs DAL
WRTB56489.0%85.7%85.8%85.8%-5.0
vs MIA
WRCIN55889.0%69.7%78.2%78.2%+69.0
vs ARI
WRDET55989.0%90.0%90.2%90.2%-10.0
vs NO
WRMIN56389.0%67.0%73.3%73.3%+77.0
vs ARI
TEDET55989.0%86.7%87.8%87.8%+10.0
vs DET
WRCAR46789.0%88.0%86.5%86.5%-6.0
vs DAL
WRTB56388.0%79.7%82.2%82.2%-1.0
vs TB
WRDAL55388.0%86.3%83.8%83.8%+2.0
vs NO
RBMIN56287.0%80.0%73.4%73.4%+14.0
vs IND
RBPIT55287.0%91.3%76.4%76.4%-10.0
vs ARI
WRDET55786.0%85.3%88.2%88.2%-10.0
vs CLE
RBNYJ56086.0%77.3%60.6%60.6%-8.0
vs SF
WRMIA25186.0%88.5%88.5%88.5%-5.0
vs MIN
QBCHI26486.0%93.0%93.0%93.0%-14.0
vs JAX
WRPHI55385.0%61.7%48.2%48.2%-5.0
vs PHI
WRJAX56185.0%82.7%80.6%80.6%+3.0
vs TB
RBDAL55185.0%78.3%77.2%77.2%+11.0
vs PIT
WRIND56085.0%76.7%80.4%80.4%+8.0
vs BUF
WRLA57085.0%81.7%81.7%81.7%-5.0
vs TEN
RBHOU55685.0%55.3%53.0%53.0%+41.0
vs IND
QBWAS45484.0%84.0%84.0%84.0%—
vs DET
RBCAR46384.0%77.7%76.0%76.0%0.0
vs JAX
WRPHI55284.0%88.0%83.4%83.4%-8.0
vs SF
WRSEA55384.0%86.3%83.2%83.2%-4.0
vs DET
WRARI56184.0%90.3%90.0%90.0%-10.0
vs TB
TEDAL55083.0%74.3%71.8%71.8%+12.0
vs NE
QBLV55083.0%94.3%96.6%96.6%-17.0
vs LV
WRNE56283.0%73.3%68.6%68.6%+19.0
vs LV
TEKC45083.0%82.3%79.5%79.5%+4.0
vs GB
WRNYJ26182.0%75.5%75.5%75.5%+13.0
vs SEA
RBSF54982.0%79.7%69.2%69.2%+8.0
vs PHI
WRJAX55982.0%81.0%77.0%77.0%+2.0
vs ATL
WRBAL56282.0%62.7%54.3%54.3%+9.0
vs BAL
RBATL55281.0%71.0%68.2%68.2%+21.0
vs PHI
TEJAX55881.0%81.7%79.2%79.2%-6.0
vs SF
WRSEA55181.0%68.3%65.2%65.2%+24.0
vs LAC
WRDEN55081.0%80.3%78.0%78.0%+8.0
vs NYJ
WRCLE55581.0%56.7%58.4%58.4%+43.0
vs JAX
WRPHI55081.0%75.0%70.4%70.4%+7.0
vs CHI
WRGB54980.0%76.0%78.8%78.8%+12.0
vs GB
TECHI55580.0%83.7%84.8%84.8%-12.0
vs WAS
TENYG57180.0%76.7%69.6%69.6%+14.0
vs PIT
WRIND55780.0%81.3%70.6%70.6%-5.0
vs CIN
WRMIA55380.0%84.3%84.8%84.8%-7.0
vs ATL
WRBAL56180.0%71.7%77.2%77.2%+33.0
vs JAX
RBPHI54877.0%77.0%77.0%77.0%—
vs GB
WRCHI55377.0%64.7%64.8%64.8%+21.0
vs CHI
WRGB54777.0%82.3%83.0%83.0%-11.0
vs CHI
TEGB54777.0%81.7%81.8%81.8%-15.0
vs HOU
WRTEN54876.0%82.7%82.2%82.2%-8.0
vs DEN
TELAC55176.0%64.3%64.3%64.3%+14.0
vs LV
WRNE55776.0%48.7%41.0%41.0%+31.0
vs LV
RBKC44575.0%76.7%74.5%74.5%+2.0
vs DEN
WRLAC55075.0%38.7%38.7%38.7%+38.0
vs SEA
WRLAC45375.0%81.0%80.3%80.3%-12.0
vs NE
WRLV54575.0%66.3%65.8%65.8%+8.0
vs HOU
WRTEN54775.0%68.3%68.0%68.0%+8.0
vs LV
WRKC44575.0%81.3%80.3%80.3%-8.0
vs CIN
TEMIA54974.0%65.0%66.6%66.6%+23.0
vs BUF
WRLA56073.0%83.7%74.0%74.0%-22.0
vs PIT
RBIND55273.0%76.3%82.4%82.4%+2.0
vs BUF
RBLA56073.0%75.7%69.2%69.2%-10.0
vs NYG
WRWAS54573.0%56.0%49.5%49.5%+14.0
vs NYJ
WRCLE54972.0%30.0%22.2%22.2%+61.0
vs WAS
WRNYG56472.0%69.0%72.0%72.0%+6.0
vs ATL
TEBAL55572.0%60.7%65.0%65.0%+14.0
vs CLE
WRPIT45272.0%77.7%77.7%77.7%-1.0
vs NYG
TEWAS54471.0%61.7%61.7%61.7%+13.0
vs CIN
WRMIA54771.0%74.7%63.4%63.4%-11.0
vs HOU
TETEN54571.0%75.0%77.6%77.6%-1.0
vs TEN
WRHOU54771.0%70.7%70.7%70.7%+2.0
vs LV
RBNE55371.0%63.0%62.0%62.0%+5.0
vs NE
TELV54270.0%77.0%77.0%77.0%-12.0
vs LA
TEBUF54570.0%65.3%66.8%66.8%+11.0
vs LA
TEBUF54570.0%67.0%68.8%68.8%+9.0
vs ARI
RBDET54670.0%75.3%76.6%76.6%-17.0
vs LA
WRBUF54570.0%65.3%64.0%64.0%-8.0
vs JAX
TEPHI54369.0%63.0%63.0%63.0%+44.0
vs NO
WRMIN54969.0%81.3%73.0%73.0%-26.0
vs LA
WRBUF54469.0%72.7%64.0%64.0%-7.0
vs MIA
WRCIN54569.0%80.3%77.0%77.0%-10.0
vs NYG
WRWAS54268.0%59.3%52.8%52.8%-1.0
vs PHI
RBJAX54968.0%58.3%55.0%55.0%+9.0
vs GB
WRCHI54768.0%64.7%63.2%63.2%+17.0
vs LV
TEKC44168.0%60.3%59.0%59.0%+5.0
vs IND
TEPIT54168.0%67.7%68.4%68.4%-7.0
vs TB
WRDAL54168.0%69.3%71.0%71.0%-6.0
vs ARI
TEDET54467.0%53.3%47.4%47.4%+32.0
vs BAL
TEATL54367.0%59.0%55.6%55.6%+16.0
vs MIN
TENO53067.0%56.0%52.3%52.3%+10.0
vs BUF
TELA55567.0%67.7%49.8%49.8%+2.0
vs GB
QBCHI54667.0%60.3%60.3%60.3%-33.0
vs BAL
TEATL54266.0%61.7%59.2%59.2%+8.0
vs BAL
WRATL54266.0%65.0%66.6%66.6%+3.0
vs IND
WRWAS44266.0%58.7%59.8%59.8%+7.0
vs NO
WRMIN54766.0%59.7%36.8%36.8%+7.0
vs BUF
TELA55365.0%59.7%64.0%64.0%+22.0
vs WAS
WRNYG55865.0%54.7%58.6%58.6%+10.0
vs LAC
WRDEN54065.0%68.7%68.4%68.4%-3.0
vs NYG
WRARI44365.0%72.0%73.8%73.8%-12.0
vs NE
TELV53965.0%80.0%81.0%81.0%-23.0
vs CIN
RBMIA54365.0%68.3%46.2%46.2%+9.0
vs LV
TENE54864.0%66.0%73.0%73.0%0.0
vs MIN
TENO52964.0%68.0%68.2%68.2%-14.0
vs CIN
WRMIA54264.0%59.0%50.4%50.4%+13.0
vs DEN
WRLAC54364.0%64.0%64.0%64.0%—
vs WAS
RBNYG55663.0%68.0%64.8%64.8%-1.0
vs IND
TEPIT53863.0%70.0%65.4%65.4%-8.0
vs LV
WRKC43863.0%32.3%24.3%24.3%+44.0
vs SEA
WRSF53863.0%51.7%56.8%56.8%+4.0
vs LAC
WRDEN53963.0%43.0%36.6%36.6%+15.0
vs LV
WRKC43863.0%56.0%59.0%59.0%+17.0
vs NO
TEMIN54462.0%30.3%18.2%18.2%+40.0
vs LA
RBBUF54062.0%62.7%66.8%66.8%+3.0
vs CLE
WRNYJ54361.0%81.3%77.2%77.2%-33.0
vs DET
TECAR44661.0%48.7%46.5%46.5%+34.0
vs LA
WRBUF53961.0%61.0%61.0%61.0%—
vs SEA
TESF53660.0%45.7%52.4%52.4%+16.0
vs NYG
RBWAS53760.0%51.7%49.0%49.0%+17.0
vs ATL
WRBAL54559.0%51.7%46.0%46.0%-10.0
vs SF
RBSEA53759.0%51.7%40.4%40.4%-1.0
vs NE
WRBUF43559.0%43.0%40.0%40.0%+27.0
vs TEN
WRHOU53959.0%63.3%61.6%61.6%-3.0
vs CLE
TENYJ54159.0%57.0%57.0%57.0%+13.0
vs CAR
QBATL24058.0%79.0%79.0%79.0%-42.0
vs GB
RBCHI54058.0%54.0%57.4%57.4%+23.0
vs DEN
TELAC53958.0%56.7%46.4%46.4%+3.0
vs NYG
WRWAS53658.0%67.7%72.5%72.5%-17.0
vs TB
WRDAL53457.0%75.0%76.2%76.2%-29.0
vs LV
TENE54357.0%45.0%47.3%47.3%-1.0
vs HOU
WRTEN53556.0%45.3%52.4%52.4%+9.0
vs ARI
WRSF33056.0%32.0%32.0%32.0%+18.0
vs NO
TEMIN53955.0%55.0%55.0%55.0%—
vs ATL
RBBAL54255.0%61.3%58.2%58.2%-7.0
vs DAL
RBTB53954.0%55.0%60.8%60.8%-5.0
vs NYJ
RBCHI45054.0%39.7%40.5%40.5%+23.0
vs HOU
RBTEN53454.0%45.7%44.6%44.6%+18.0
vs HOU
WRCIN23253.0%57.0%57.0%57.0%-8.0
vs NE
RBLV53253.0%68.0%71.8%71.8%-14.0
vs DET
TECAR44053.0%49.3%45.8%45.8%+2.0
vs DET
TEARI53953.0%43.0%36.4%36.4%+17.0
vs DET
WRARI53953.0%21.0%14.4%14.4%+48.0
vs NYJ
RBCLE53653.0%56.7%60.4%60.4%-13.0
vs CHI
WRNYJ41753.0%49.0%49.0%49.0%+8.0
vs TEN
TEHOU53452.0%56.7%60.8%60.8%-12.0
vs MIA
TECIN53452.0%43.0%51.0%51.0%+26.0
vs HOU
WRTEN53352.0%64.7%59.8%59.8%-10.0
vs MIA
TECIN53452.0%29.7%32.4%32.4%+36.0
vs LAC
RBDEN53252.0%44.3%42.0%42.0%+20.0
vs TEN
QBBAL43352.0%84.0%88.0%88.0%-48.0
vs PHI
WRJAX53751.0%50.0%47.8%47.8%-11.0
vs DET
TECAR43851.0%51.7%52.8%52.8%+3.0
vs BUF
TELA54150.0%44.7%44.0%44.0%+2.0
vs ATL
WRCAR23350.0%51.5%51.5%51.5%-3.0
vs CHI
WRGB53049.0%33.0%25.2%25.2%+31.0
vs LV
WRNE53749.0%51.3%52.6%52.6%+3.0
vs DET
RBARI53649.0%52.7%48.2%48.2%+4.0
vs DET
WRARI53649.0%56.0%59.0%59.0%-15.0
vs PHI
TEJAX53549.0%42.7%46.8%46.8%+15.0
vs LAC
TEDEN53048.0%44.3%47.0%47.0%+3.0
vs DET
RBNYJ33248.0%57.0%57.0%57.0%-17.0
vs LAC
TEDEN53048.0%58.3%58.0%58.0%-19.0
vs LA
RBPHI42948.0%28.7%24.3%24.3%+44.0
vs WAS
TENYG54348.0%32.7%34.4%34.4%+15.0
vs HOU
RBTEN53048.0%51.3%52.2%52.2%-5.0
vs ATL
RBBAL53546.0%39.0%42.0%42.0%+8.0
vs SF
WRSEA52946.0%50.7%54.8%54.8%-14.0
vs DAL
WRTB53346.0%53.7%62.0%62.0%+6.0
vs TEN
WRHOU53045.0%44.3%44.6%44.6%-17.0
vs NYG
TEWAS52845.0%47.0%44.2%44.2%+3.0
vs GB
RBMIN12945.0%45.0%45.0%45.0%—
vs PIT
WRIND53245.0%56.3%59.0%59.0%-28.0
vs MIA
TECIN52945.0%52.7%45.2%45.2%-17.0
vs DEN
WRLAC53045.0%65.3%70.6%70.6%-48.0
vs SEA
WRNE13144.0%44.0%44.0%44.0%—
vs HOU
TETEN52844.0%45.3%41.8%41.8%-8.0
vs LA
TEBUF52844.0%35.3%39.8%39.8%+20.0
vs CHI
RBGB52744.0%40.7%38.6%38.6%-11.0
vs DET
RBARI53244.0%45.0%51.6%51.6%-11.0
vs DEN
WRLA33844.0%37.3%37.3%37.3%+2.0
vs SEA
WRSF52643.0%62.0%57.6%57.6%-24.0
vs SEA
WRSF52643.0%35.3%32.0%32.0%+11.0
vs MIN
WRNO51942.0%66.3%69.4%69.4%-43.0
vs MIN
RBNO51942.0%32.0%28.4%28.4%+4.0
vs GB
TECHI52942.0%58.3%60.2%60.2%-31.0
vs CAR
QBATL22942.0%42.0%42.0%42.0%—
vs DEN
RBLAC52842.0%34.0%23.8%23.8%+7.0
vs PIT
TEIND53042.0%42.3%38.2%38.2%-5.0
vs SF
RBSEA52641.0%38.0%37.2%37.2%+4.0
vs TB
TEMIN32441.0%55.3%55.3%55.3%-19.0
vs BUF
WRNE43141.0%62.7%64.5%64.5%-35.0
vs CHI
RBGB52541.0%41.0%41.0%41.0%—
vs DET
TEARI53041.0%41.0%41.0%41.0%—
vs TEN
WRHOU52741.0%42.0%52.6%52.6%+10.0
Brandin Cooks
vs SEA
WRSF52440.0%26.0%26.0%26.0%+28.0
vs NE
TELV52440.0%30.3%37.2%37.2%+9.0
vs IND
WRBAL12740.0%40.0%40.0%40.0%—
vs JAX
RBDEN22540.0%23.0%23.0%23.0%+34.0
vs TB
WRDAL52440.0%22.0%17.8%17.8%+30.0
vs NE
WRBUF42339.0%44.7%52.5%52.5%-25.0
vs TEN
TEHOU52639.0%44.0%41.0%41.0%+3.0
vs ARI
WRDET52639.0%56.3%62.4%62.4%-43.0
vs ATL
TEBAL53039.0%49.0%42.8%42.8%-19.0
vs GB
RBCHI52739.0%16.7%10.2%10.2%+28.0
vs DAL
WRTB52839.0%39.3%34.0%34.0%-17.0
vs BUF
WRLA53239.0%26.7%26.7%26.7%+16.0
vs NE
RBLV52338.0%17.3%16.0%16.0%+30.0
vs MIN
TENO51738.0%29.7%25.5%25.5%+6.0
vs DAL
TETB52738.0%33.7%23.8%23.8%+30.0
vs LV
RBNO32838.0%50.3%50.3%50.3%-16.0
vs CIN
TEMIA52538.0%47.0%42.6%42.6%-24.0
vs NYG
TEWAS52337.0%41.3%43.6%43.6%-1.0
vs NYG
WRWAS52337.0%41.0%46.2%46.2%-19.0
vs DET
WRCAR42837.0%34.7%34.7%34.7%-19.0
vs SEA
WRSF52237.0%34.3%34.3%34.3%-1.0
vs LAC
RBDEN52337.0%39.0%42.0%42.0%-7.0
vs TEN
WRBAL42336.0%36.0%36.0%36.0%—
vs CLE
WRCAR32836.0%65.3%65.3%65.3%-40.0
vs CLE
TENYJ52536.0%37.3%32.8%32.8%-2.0
vs DAL
RBTB52636.0%41.7%41.2%41.2%-7.0
vs LV
WRNE52736.0%32.0%26.6%26.6%+11.0
vs SF
WRDEN42436.0%57.3%57.8%57.8%-34.0
vs WAS
WRIND42335.0%27.0%27.0%27.0%+16.0
vs SF
TESEA52235.0%30.7%27.2%27.2%+5.0
vs NYG
RBWAS52235.0%45.7%44.6%44.6%-10.0
vs ARI
RBDET52335.0%27.7%25.8%25.8%+18.0
vs CHI
TEGB52134.0%29.7%31.6%31.6%+12.0
vs DEN
RBLAC52334.0%36.3%33.0%33.0%-3.0
vs SEA
WRLAC42434.0%56.0%54.3%54.3%-54.0
vs CHI
TEGB52134.0%31.0%31.6%31.6%-13.0
vs TB
TEDAL52033.0%37.0%34.2%34.2%-7.0
vs GB
QBCHI52333.0%44.7%44.7%44.7%+32.0
vs CLE
TENYJ52333.0%39.7%39.2%39.2%-11.0
vs BAL
WRATL52133.0%34.7%35.4%35.4%-4.0
vs IND
WRPIT52033.0%34.3%47.4%47.4%+2.0
De'Zhaun Stribling
vs LA
WRSF12132.0%32.0%32.0%32.0%—
vs SF
TESEA52032.0%30.3%26.8%26.8%0.0
vs TEN
WRHOU52132.0%40.7%40.8%40.8%+3.0
vs JAX
TEPHI52032.0%54.7%52.8%52.8%-48.0
vs MIA
WRSF21631.0%47.0%47.0%47.0%-32.0
vs PHI
WRJAX52231.0%34.7%30.8%30.8%-5.0
vs MIN
RBNO51431.0%25.3%26.3%26.3%+5.0
vs LAC
TEDEN51931.0%28.7%29.6%29.6%+10.0
vs NYG
TEARI42030.0%31.3%32.3%32.3%-4.0
vs ATL
RBCAR22030.0%24.5%24.5%24.5%+11.0
vs DEN
RBLAC52030.0%35.7%45.6%45.6%-5.0
vs MIA
WRCIN51929.0%58.0%41.6%41.6%-60.0
vs NYJ
RBCLE52029.0%35.3%32.0%32.0%-5.0
vs MIA
TECIN51929.0%31.0%25.5%25.5%-12.0
vs TEN
TEBAL41828.0%45.3%49.5%49.5%-25.0
vs WAS
RBSEA31928.0%36.7%36.7%36.7%-6.0
vs MIN
RBNO51227.0%32.3%31.5%31.5%-11.0
vs PIT
TEIND51927.0%28.7%25.2%25.2%-2.0
vs BUF
RBLA52227.0%23.7%27.8%27.8%+12.0
Brandon Smith
vs IND
WRPIT51627.0%27.0%27.0%27.0%—
vs LV
RBKC41627.0%24.0%27.0%27.0%0.0
vs NE
WRLV51627.0%13.7%12.8%12.8%+19.0
vs PIT
RBIND51927.0%23.7%17.6%17.6%-2.0
vs KC
WRIND21726.0%42.5%42.5%42.5%-33.0
vs LA
RBNYG21526.0%31.0%31.0%31.0%-10.0
vs NE
RBPIT21826.0%42.0%42.0%42.0%-32.0
vs DEN
TELA32226.0%45.0%45.0%45.0%-32.0
vs ATL
TEBAL51925.0%26.0%19.2%19.2%-3.0
Nick Vannett
vs ATL
TEBAL51925.0%25.0%25.0%25.0%—
vs NYJ
WRCLE51624.0%15.7%9.4%9.4%+2.0
vs CIN
WRMIA51624.0%18.7%13.6%13.6%+14.0
vs KC
WRLV41923.0%46.7%50.0%50.0%-34.0
vs CIN
WRMIA51523.0%18.0%18.0%18.0%+8.0
vs LAC
WRDEN51423.0%14.0%14.0%14.0%+18.0
vs SEA
TESF51322.0%14.3%17.0%17.0%+5.0
vs BAL
RBATL51422.0%30.3%32.8%32.8%-20.0
vs NE
WRLV51322.0%22.0%22.0%22.0%—
vs TEN
WRPHI21722.0%22.0%22.0%22.0%—
vs LA
RBBUF51422.0%25.7%25.7%25.7%-10.0
vs GB
WRCHI51522.0%14.3%9.2%9.2%+12.0
vs NYJ
RBCLE51421.0%9.7%10.8%10.8%+19.0
vs CHI
WRCAR11421.0%21.0%21.0%21.0%—
vs JAX
RBPHI51321.0%31.7%32.8%32.8%-27.0
vs TEN
TEHOU51320.0%29.3%25.6%25.6%-4.0
vs BAL
WRATL51320.0%21.0%25.8%25.8%-5.0
vs LV
RBNE51520.0%12.0%10.8%10.8%+17.0
vs TB
WRDAL51220.0%18.7%19.0%19.0%+2.0
vs MIA
WRCIN51320.0%36.5%36.5%36.5%-33.0
vs NO
WRMIN51420.0%13.3%19.0%19.0%+7.0
vs LV
TENE51520.0%14.7%14.7%14.7%-4.0
vs CAR
WRCLE31420.0%24.3%24.3%24.3%-4.0
vs NYJ
TECLE51319.0%30.7%35.6%35.6%-15.0
vs JAX
TEPHI51219.0%21.7%20.0%20.0%-1.0
vs JAX
WRPHI51219.0%15.7%15.7%15.7%+3.0
vs IND
RBWAS41219.0%9.0%9.3%9.3%+19.0
vs CLE
TENYJ51319.0%48.7%44.8%44.8%-50.0
vs LAC
WRDEN51219.0%21.3%21.3%21.3%-8.0
vs JAX
QBNE31219.0%19.0%19.0%19.0%—
vs WAS
RBNYG51719.0%13.0%8.8%8.8%+1.0
vs BAL
WRATL51219.0%20.0%22.0%22.0%-4.0
vs LV
WRLAC21218.0%18.0%18.0%18.0%0.0
C.J. Williams
vs CLE
WRJAX11018.0%18.0%18.0%18.0%—
vs NE
WRLV51118.0%16.3%16.6%16.6%+4.0
vs DEN
TELAC51218.0%36.0%36.0%36.0%-31.0
vs SEA
RBSF51118.0%19.7%27.0%27.0%-8.0
vs PHI
RBJAX51318.0%17.0%13.6%13.6%+3.0
vs WAS
RBNYG51618.0%19.3%18.0%18.0%0.0
vs DET
WRARI51318.0%18.0%18.0%18.0%—
vs CHI
WRGB51118.0%36.0%30.0%30.0%-20.0
vs HOU
WRTEN51117.0%13.0%10.2%10.2%+5.0
vs TB
RBGB41017.0%34.7%40.0%40.0%-24.0
vs NE
QBLV51017.0%17.0%17.0%17.0%—
vs IND
WRHOU3917.0%16.5%16.5%16.5%+1.0
vs SF
WRSEA51117.0%18.7%21.8%21.8%0.0
vs BAL
TEATL51016.0%20.7%25.6%25.6%-7.0
vs LV
TELAC21116.0%35.5%35.5%35.5%-39.0
vs WAS
RBDAL2916.0%12.5%12.5%12.5%+7.0
vs NO
WRLV31116.0%36.7%36.7%36.7%-38.0
vs CHI
TEGB51016.0%13.7%11.4%11.4%-7.0
vs NYJ
WRCLE51116.0%64.7%65.8%65.8%-76.0
vs IND
QBWAS41016.0%53.7%53.7%53.7%-84.0
vs LA
RBBUF51016.0%10.3%10.8%10.8%+9.0
vs SF
QBLA11016.0%16.0%16.0%16.0%—
vs LV
RBNE51216.0%30.0%37.5%37.5%-21.0
vs DET
RBCAR41115.0%12.3%11.8%11.8%-1.0
vs TEN
TEHOU51015.0%12.0%12.0%12.0%+6.0
vs WAS
TENYG51315.0%37.0%35.4%35.4%-37.0
vs DEN
WRLAC51015.0%6.7%10.0%10.0%+11.0
vs CHI
RBGB5915.0%26.3%21.2%21.2%-13.0
vs MIA
QBSF2815.0%15.0%15.0%15.0%—
Carlos Washington
vs CIN
RBMIA5914.0%14.0%14.0%14.0%—
vs TEN
RBHOU5914.0%44.3%46.8%46.8%-42.0
vs CLE
RBNYJ51014.0%6.7%4.0%4.0%+8.0
vs CIN
RBMIA5914.0%16.7%14.3%14.3%-17.0
vs CHI
WRGB5813.0%16.0%15.8%15.8%+10.0
vs DET
WRCAR41013.0%13.0%13.0%13.0%—
vs LV
TEKC4813.0%12.3%14.0%14.0%+1.0
vs BUF
WRLA51113.0%29.0%32.0%32.0%-37.0
vs CAR
WRCHI11013.0%13.0%13.0%13.0%—
vs IND
RBPIT5813.0%6.0%6.0%6.0%+13.0
vs PHI
RBJAX5912.0%19.3%24.0%24.0%-13.0
vs DET
RBBUF2912.0%15.5%15.5%15.5%-7.0
vs LA
TESF1812.0%12.0%12.0%12.0%—
vs LA
QBNYG2712.0%56.0%56.0%56.0%-88.0
vs ATL
WRNO4912.0%11.0%9.8%9.8%-2.0
vs BAL
RBTEN4812.0%7.7%7.7%7.7%+12.0
vs CLE
QBJAX1712.0%12.0%12.0%12.0%—
vs ARI
TEDET5812.0%10.3%10.3%10.3%+6.0
vs LA
WRBUF5711.0%11.0%11.0%11.0%—
vs LAC
RBDEN5711.0%15.7%18.3%18.3%-7.0
Zach Ertz
vs JAX
TEPHI5711.0%23.3%23.3%23.3%-10.0
Austin Ekeler
vs NYG
RBWAS5610.0%18.5%18.5%18.5%-17.0
vs PIT
WRIND5710.0%15.7%10.4%10.4%-13.0
Nick Kallerup
vs WAS
TESEA3710.0%18.5%18.5%18.5%-17.0
vs PIT
WRIND5710.0%9.3%9.3%9.3%-7.0
vs LV
WRKC4610.0%55.3%62.3%62.3%-67.0
vs DAL
RBTB5710.0%5.3%4.0%4.0%+5.0
vs ATL
WRBAL579.0%38.7%38.3%38.3%-43.0
vs IND
RBWAS469.0%9.0%9.0%9.0%—
vs GB
WRCHI569.0%5.7%14.2%14.2%+7.0
vs TEN
WRNYG369.0%10.0%10.0%10.0%+4.0
vs CHI
QBPHI348.0%8.0%8.0%8.0%—
vs DET
RBARI568.0%2.7%3.6%3.6%+8.0
vs IND
WRPIT558.0%12.3%11.6%11.6%-3.0
vs LV
WRKC458.0%4.7%3.8%3.8%+6.0
vs NO
WRMIN568.0%6.0%6.0%6.0%+4.0
vs TB
TEDAL558.0%12.7%17.8%17.8%0.0
vs NE
RBLV558.0%15.0%16.6%16.6%-13.0
vs BAL
TEATL558.0%20.7%18.0%18.0%-22.0
vs IND
TEPIT558.0%5.0%4.2%4.2%+7.0
Tanner Koziol
vs PHI
TEJAX568.0%9.7%9.7%9.7%-8.0
vs PHI
WRJAX568.0%5.3%6.6%6.6%+8.0
vs NO
RBMIN557.0%12.3%12.2%12.2%-8.0
vs BUF
WRLA567.0%35.7%40.4%40.4%-20.0
vs IND
TEHOU347.0%9.7%9.7%9.7%-4.0
vs TEN
WRNYJ157.0%7.0%7.0%7.0%—
vs GB
TECHI557.0%18.0%19.4%19.4%-18.0
vs LA
RBPHI447.0%31.7%41.5%41.5%-65.0
vs DAL
TETB546.0%7.0%5.6%5.6%0.0
vs NO
RBMIN546.0%7.7%6.8%6.8%-6.0
vs WAS
QBNYG556.0%6.0%6.0%6.0%—
vs ATL
QBCAR246.0%8.0%8.0%8.0%-4.0
vs SEA
TELAC446.0%3.5%3.5%3.5%+5.0
vs LV
TENE545.0%7.3%9.4%9.4%+2.0
Chris Myarick
vs LAC
TELV235.0%6.0%6.0%6.0%-2.0
vs KC
RBMIA345.0%55.7%55.7%55.7%-71.0
vs ARI
QBDET535.0%5.0%5.0%5.0%—
vs LA
TEBUF535.0%4.0%5.4%5.4%+3.0
vs HOU
TETEN535.0%2.5%2.5%2.5%+5.0
vs NE
QBJAX335.0%5.0%5.0%5.0%—
vs ARI
WRDET535.0%2.7%1.6%1.6%+5.0
vs BAL
QBATL535.0%5.0%5.0%5.0%—
vs TB
RBDAL535.0%13.7%13.7%13.7%-16.0
vs NYG
WRWAS535.0%5.0%5.0%5.0%—
vs SEA
RBNE134.0%4.0%4.0%4.0%—
vs DET
WRARI534.0%1.3%4.8%4.8%+4.0
vs DET
RBCAR423.0%1.5%1.5%1.5%+3.0
vs LV
RBKC423.0%3.7%2.8%2.8%-5.0
vs ARI
WRNYG423.0%6.7%9.3%9.3%-5.0
vs MIN
WRTB323.0%7.0%7.0%7.0%-8.0
vs NYJ
WRGB223.0%30.0%30.0%30.0%-54.0
vs DAL
WRTB523.0%4.0%4.2%4.2%-5.0
vs CLE
WRNYJ523.0%11.0%11.0%11.0%0.0
vs IND
QBPIT523.0%3.5%3.5%3.5%-1.0
vs PHI
TEJAX523.0%11.3%19.6%19.6%+1.0
vs NO
TEMIN523.0%57.0%61.2%61.2%-80.0
vs CHI
QBGB523.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%—
vs PIT
TECLE412.0%1.3%1.0%1.0%+2.0
vs MIN
WRNO512.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%—
vs PIT
WRCIN312.0%11.0%11.0%11.0%-15.0
vs NYG
TEWAS512.0%19.7%18.4%18.4%-9.0
vs WAS
WRNYG522.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%—
vs TEN
RBHOU512.0%1.0%1.0%1.0%+2.0
vs BAL
TETEN412.0%6.0%4.5%4.5%-1.0
vs IND
WRWAS412.0%8.0%12.5%12.5%-5.0
vs HOU
RBTEN512.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%—
vs CIN
TEMIA512.0%0.7%0.4%0.4%+2.0
vs PHI
RBJAX511.0%4.7%6.6%6.6%-1.0
vs GB
WRNYJ211.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%-2.0
vs DET
WRCAR411.0%3.5%3.5%3.5%-5.0
vs DEN
QBKC111.0%1.0%1.0%1.0%—
vs DAL
TETB511.0%1.3%1.5%1.5%-2.0
Max Klare
vs PHI
TELA411.0%0.3%0.3%0.3%+1.0
vs CAR
QBCLE311.0%1.0%1.0%1.0%—
vs BUF
WRLA500.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0
vs PIT
WRIND500.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0
vs MIN
WRNO500.0%2.3%3.8%3.8%-4.0
vs JAX
WRPHI500.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0
vs IND
RBHOU300.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0
vs JAX
RBPHI500.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs WAS
WRNYG500.0%0.5%0.5%0.5%-1.0
Cole Payton
vs JAX
QBPHI500.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs BUF
RBLA500.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0
vs DET
WRARI500.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0
Dillon Bell
vs CHI
WRMIN200.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs JAX
RBCLE100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs NE
RBPIT200.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%-4.0
vs DET
TECAR400.0%2.0%3.3%3.3%0.0
Gary Jennings
vs LV
WRLAC200.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs LA
WRBUF500.0%3.7%3.2%3.2%-3.0
Jack Endries
vs JAX
TECIN400.0%1.0%1.0%1.0%-2.0
vs SEA
TESF500.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs CAR
TEDET400.0%5.7%4.3%4.3%-15.0
vs ARI
RBDET500.0%1.0%0.6%0.6%0.0
vs LV
WRNO300.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs DET
WRNYJ300.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs TB
QBCIN100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs SEA
RBSF500.0%5.0%5.0%5.0%0.0
vs CIN
RBTB100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs LA
TEPHI400.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs HOU
RBTEN500.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0
Justin Joly
vs KC
TEMIA300.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs IND
WRPIT500.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0
vs PIT
WRCIN300.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs ARI
WRLAC100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs CLE
RBNYJ500.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0
vs LA
WRDEN300.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs ATL
WRBAL500.0%6.7%20.4%20.4%-3.0
vs NYG
WRWAS500.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0
vs DEN
WRSF400.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs NE
WRSEA100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs LV
WRKC400.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0
vs ATL
RBBAL500.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0
vs NYG
RBLA200.0%6.5%6.5%6.5%-13.0
Thomas Fidone II
vs WAS
TENYG500.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
vs ARI
WRDET500.0%0.3%0.2%0.2%-1.0
vs IND
RBPIT500.0%2.7%2.8%2.8%-3.0
vs MIN
TENO500.0%5.3%6.8%6.8%-9.0
vs SF
RBSEA500.0%1.0%0.8%0.8%-3.0
vs GB
RBCHI500.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—

Showing 517 of 517 players.

NFL Snap Counts by Team

Use the NFL snap count table above to compare weekly playing time across all 32 teams. Search by team or player and filter by position to see the latest offensive snaps, snap percentage, recent averages, season usage, and week-over-week change.

Team snap counts are especially useful when depth charts change. Injuries, emerging players, committee adjustments, and changes in personnel packages can all create meaningful shifts in playing time from one week to the next.

How to Use NFL Snap Counts

NFL snap counts show how many offensive plays a player was on the field for during a game. Snap percentage measures that playing time as a share of the team's total offensive snaps.

Snap percentage is often more useful when comparing games because NFL teams do not run the same number of offensive plays every week. A player can record fewer total snaps in a low-volume game while still maintaining the same role within the offense.

Compare a player's latest snap percentage with their last-three-game, last-five-game, and season averages to identify meaningful changes in usage rather than reacting to a single box score.

Why Snap Share Matters for NFL Player Props

Playing time creates opportunity. Changes in snap share can precede changes in routes, targets, carries, receptions, yards, and touchdown opportunities, making snap counts a useful starting point for NFL player prop research.

Snap counts are most useful when combined with other usage and matchup data. After identifying a changing role, compare red-zone opportunities, defensive matchups, recent production, and available prop lines before making a betting decision.

KofSports' NFL Player Prop Trends tool can be used alongside snap data to compare recent player performance against current prop lines.

NFL Snap Count Trends and Player Usage

Week-over-week snap changes can help identify rising rookies, injury replacements, wide receivers moving into larger roles, tight end rotation changes, and running backs gaining or losing work within a committee.

The Change column above compares each player's latest snap percentage with their previous game. Use it with the L3, L5, and season columns to determine whether a usage shift looks like a one-week outlier or part of a developing trend.

Continue Your NFL Research

NFL Snap Count Definitions

Snaps

The number of offensive plays in which the player was on the field during their most recent game.

Snap %

The percentage of the team's offensive snaps played by the player in their most recent game.

L3 / L5

The player's average offensive snap percentage across their last three or five games played.

Change

The difference between the player's latest snap percentage and their previous game's snap percentage.

NFL Snap Counts FAQ

What are NFL snap counts?

NFL snap counts measure how many offensive plays a player was on the field for during a game. They help quantify actual playing time beyond traditional box-score statistics.

Where can I find NFL snap counts by team?

The KofSports NFL Snap Counts tool includes players from all 32 NFL teams. Use the search field above to enter a team abbreviation or player name and narrow the table.

What is NFL snap percentage?

Snap percentage is the share of a team's offensive plays that a player participated in. It makes playing time easier to compare across games with different numbers of offensive plays.

When are NFL snap counts updated?

KofSports updates the snap count database as new weekly game data is processed. The current week available in the database is displayed at the top of this page.

How can snap counts help with NFL player props?

Snap counts can reveal changes in playing time that affect a player's opportunity for carries, routes, targets, receptions, yards, and touchdowns. They are best used together with matchup, usage, and prop-line research.

Snap-count data is provided for research and informational purposes. Historical usage does not guarantee future playing time or betting outcomes.